Mobile Devices: 30 Percent Of Traffic, 15 Percent Of Sales

Mobile Devices: 30 Percent Of Traffic, 15 Percent Of Sales


A new “year in review” report from e-commerce platformShopVisible offers some interesting insights and confirms consumer behavior patterns seen in earlier data. In particular, mobile devices are generating an increasing amount of traffic to e-commerce sites; however the online sales they deliver are half that volume.
Overall mobile devices were responsible for 30 percent of traffic but only 15 percent of online orders in 2013. And if you consider tablets to be more like PCs than smartphones (as Google does) then “mobile” orders were only 4 percent of the total.
StatCounter data for the US market are in agreement with ShopVisible. The chart below shows that “mobile” (non-PC) traffic now represents about 30 percent of the total.
As suggested by the data above, conversion rates for smartphones are much lower than PCs, though mobile ad CTRs and other engagement metrics are often considerably higher. This is well established in multiple studies and data sets. Rarely are the reasons explored or discussed thoroughly in these types of reports.
One major reason that online smartphone purchases are much lower than their traffic is the cumbersome nature of the mobile checkout experience (sites like Amazon are an exception). However that should improve over time.
In addition, most people shopping on smartphones are either “on the go” (and will buy in stores offline) or they’re “higher up in the funnel” conducting research that may not lead immediately to a purchase. Accordingly mobile devices are both a great brand/awareness medium and a powerful direct-response medium — though mostly for offline sales.
The ShopVisible report also shows the degree to which Q4 and holiday sales are make or break for most e-tailers. According to the company’s data, 54 percent of 2013 conversions/sales took place in Q4. The other three quarters saw roughly equal sales volume although Q2 was slightly higher than the first and third quarters.
The good news for online merchants is that conversions tend to go way up in Q4 and December in particular.

Grabbing Attention Vs. Getting People To Care About Your Content

Grabbing Attention Vs. Getting People To Care About Your Content


A Conductor study from July 2013 highlights an increasingly pervasive problem in the digital media industry. There is so much content being produced on a daily basis that the supply of content far outstrips what the attention economy can sustain.content
Every day, there are 2 million blog posts, 294 billion emails, 864 thousand hours of video created, and that’s before you take into account social media, instant messaging and other digital interactions. As a result, 80 percent of readers only read the headline of an article and either skim or skip over the rest.
The common response to these types of studies is: focus on writing better headlines to grab readers’ attention. For example, this infographic from BlueGlass published on Mashable suggests50% of your emphasis when writing should be on the headline based on Copyblogger’s 50/50 rule of headlines.
The Conductor study reaches similar conclusions, citing the importance of headlines on click-through rates, but also acknowledges that they focused solely on A/B testing different combinations of headlines, but did not look deeper into why certain headlines resonated better with readers, or any other facts that could have contributed to higher click-through rates independent of the headline.

What Influences Engagement?

Not all users behave the same way — a user’s intent when scrolling through a list of content impacts how s/he behaves toward the options. For example, if you’re performing queries on Google looking for a specific answer, you’re going to interact with the results differently than if you’re aimlessly browsing a site like Buzzfeed.
Furthermore, how you receive the content and how it is presented to you (beyond headlines) also impacts engagement levels.

• New Visitor Vs. Return Visitor: Anyone who has visited your website previously already has an opinion about your site, content and even individual authors. The user’s perception of the quality of content can increase or decrease the odds of clicking on a link. A good example of this is readers who subscribe to your content through feeds or newsletters — you don’t need to sell headlines to these readers because they’ve already bought-in.

• Social Proof: Content received through your network on social media channels such as Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn has already been filtered for quality and relevancy. Oftentimes, people sharing this content don’t even use headlines and opt for commentary instead.
• Search Markup: Implementing markup such as rich snippets and Google Authorshipalong with breadcrumbs and curating your sitelinks (removing/demoting) can help content stand out in results and lend it an air of credibility.

The Attention Economy

A common theme in every copywriting piece I’ve read about headline writing is to grab the reader’s attention. Copywriters rely on using formulas designed to trick the reader into clicking an article, usually by making the reader believe in artificial scarcity, promising unbelievable results, generating controversy, overselling urgency or importance among other things.
The implication you get from much of this advice is that the relationship between an author or publisher and a reader is a onetime event that you need to capitalize on. The fact of the matter is it takes time and effort to demonstrate a consistent level of quality in your content and build the kind of relationship and readership that encourages people to read beyond the headline (or irrespective of the headline).
Grabbing someone’s attention is not the same thing as getting someone to care — and you cannot force someone to care by manipulating them through a catchy headline.

Getting People To Care

In an interview quoted on PaidContent.com, Upworthy co-founder Peter Koechley asked the question, “How do you get people to care about important stuff amidst the avalanche of content we all face each day?” You can start by asking yourself a series of questions.

1. Why do I care about what I’ve written, and why should other people care? Is it personally or professionally relevant to others as it is to me?

2. What does what I have written accomplish for me, and what will it accomplish for others? Does it personally or professionally help others achieve their goals?
People are surprisingly adept at determining what will create value for them and therefore is important enough to care about. When you go back to the statistic we’re trying to address — 80% of readers only read article headlines and do not click through to the content — with a little thought, we can infer possible reasons behind this that may go beyond headlines.
A majority of the content published today is not original content or otherwise valuable content, and readers know this and are able to filter this kind of information quickly and efficiently. When you try to be everything to everyone, you lose yourself in the process. When you focus on volume over quality, you dilute the value readers associate with your brand.
Content that is unique, exclusive, comprehensive, utilitarian and relevant to the reader will not be skimmed over. Chris Brogan has some good thoughts on this, but I disagree with his last point — opt for comprehensiveness over brevity and utility over entertainment.

Using Trust & Authority Obviate Filtering

When you’re competing in a market where supply far outstrips demand, you need to obviate the need for filtering, and the best way to do this is to offer a consistent and differentiated value proposition. This core tenet of content marketing takes time, effort and careful nurturing of the authority loop.
How do you create trust and establish yourself as an authority? Assess your readers’ needs and wants, gratify those needs selflessly and comprehensively, and build a level of trust between the reader and your content that sets you up as an authority.
Over time, the reader will know that you are an authority who always provides value because you have demonstrated this in the past and developed trust. Do not dilute the value you provide through the temptation of viral marketing (forgoing quality and relevancy for mass market appeal).
An example of this is how a reader may perceive and relate to well-known tech journalist Om Malik as a writer. An article he shared over Twitter – Some of my favorite posts (by me) of 2013— could be interpreted is self-promotion and self-congratulatory; but, is it? Absolutely not.
The reason goes back to the level of trust and authority Om has built up over time by demonstrating the value he creates for those who choose to read his columns. This roundup is more a chance for us laggards to catch up on what we missed in the last year rather than Om patting himself on the back.

Quality Content Doesn’t Need Engineered Headlines

Looking back, I cannot help but feel like every piece of advice outlined in the Conductor study is something that would alienate the discerning reader from your content.

1. A majority of the respondents actually preferred traditional sentence case instead of all capital letters. This makes sense because all capital letters have a poor readability score and project an image of low editorial standards. Also, while you may be able to rationalize yelling at a college-aged audience when writing about the zombie apocalypse, you would not want to do the same when writing about marketing macro-trends to the VP of Marketing at a major corporation. Did you know that Google AdWords has specificeditorial guidelines that prohibit the use of excessive capitalization?

2. A little over a third of the respondents preferred headlines with numbers in them (i.e., the list format). While there is a usability advantage to using lists (you can read a few items, stop and then continue when you want), lists are also reductive by nature and leave readers with nothing more than a fleeting sense of being informed — you get a morsel of information about x number of items but are not well-informed about any of the points. A better approach is write a comprehensive piece of content and use unordered and ordered lists within it as relevant; but, do not use the listicle format as a guiding principle.
3. If you’re making a subjective assertion, do not present it as fact; a superlative should only be used when you can back it up with data. Superlatives are generally indicative of a lazy marketing effort and an attention grab — they make an obvious statement that you are trying to sell rather than let the content speak for itself.
The approach you take to headline writing sends out some very strong signals to the seasoned reader about who you are, what your motivations/intentions/goals are, and how much value can be derived from what you have to say. One thing I’ve learned from thought leaders that I respect, trust, and read regularly is their headlines accomplish a very simple task — they inform the reader about what to expect from the paragraphs that follow in the simplest most straightforward terms.
On the other hand, articles that I discover through un-vetted sources use headlines to sell. They use headlines for grabbing attention, to make up for lack of demonstrated authority or trust, and to make up for providing inconsistent or diluted value.
The most important distinction to make is between grabbing someone’s attention and getting someone to care. The former is a short-term and sometimes manipulative strategy that relies on formulaic headlines while the latter is a long-term objective achieved through hard work, developing trust and authority and letting excellent content speak for itself.
In simple terms, ask yourself — can I distinguish between a headline from The New York Times and The Daily Mail without explicit context? An informed reader and writer can, and that’s the point I’m trying to make.

Google Yanks Fake FBI Listing From Google Maps, Puts New Blocks In Place To Stop Further Abuse

Google Yanks Fake FBI Listing From Google Maps, Puts New Blocks In Place To Stop Further Abuse

In response to a string of cases where fake business/organization listings have been added to Google Maps, Google says it has removed those listings and put in place new hurdles to make it more difficult for this kind of abuse to get through its system.
This latest run of problems came to light about a week ago, when some users discovered they could use Google Map Maker to create fake businesses that would be verified via a phone call. In the beginning, many of the fake listings were harmless.
More recently, the same user took advantage of Map Maker tocreate fake FBI and Secret Service office listings using his own phone number, and even managed to intercept calls to both agencies. Both of those listings were created in close proximity to actual offices, adding to the confusion over which listing was real.
Google has now removed the fake FBI and Secret Service listings, as well as others that have been exposed over the past week.
In addition, contacts at the company tell us that they’ve put new restrictions in place that will make it more difficult for this kind of activity to produce a “live” place listing on Google Maps.
This is hardly the first time users have found a hole in Google’s systems that allowed the creation of fake business listings in Google Maps. More than five years ago, for example, Danny Sullivan wrote about being able to “hijack” Yahoo’s listing and changing the company name to Microsoft.
In this latest case, though, the timing is particularly bad since Google just released its new Google Maps product out of beta.
The hole actually involved Map Maker, Google’s product that allows for crowd-sourced improvements to Google Maps. Hundreds of thousands of edits over the years have helped improve Maps, but it was also still open to the kind of exploits that have been detailed over the past week.
Given the competitive nature of local search, it probably won’t be too long before we find out if Google’s new restrictions succeed in preventing more of this kind of abuse … or if users find other holes they can exploit.

How Two Top European Clothing Giants Overpowered the Search Marketing Competition

How Two Top European Clothing Giants Overpowered the Search Marketing Competition

Editor’s Note: The comments at the end of this article have indicated one of the companies mentioned in this post may not be as “white hat” as the author assumed in her research. We appreciate our readers’ feedback and comments on this! -Kelsey
There has been a monstrous wave riding through Europe’s search market and it’s crushing the competitors with the force of Poseidon’s trident. The brilliant search marketing conducted by companies like Zalando in Germany and ASOS in the UK reveals strategies to be mirrored, no matter what industry or market you are in.
These two domains have taken the Clothing & Accessories industry as their own and what’s even more amazing is their share of search. Inspiration from these companies can put you on the right path to great visibility in the SERPs. Just wait ‘til you see the tremendous advantage that these guys have over the mere fish in the sea!

ASOS and Zalando: Search Marketing

Let’s take a quick look at the search marketing situation in the Clothing & Accessories Industry in Germany and the UK.

This data refers to the share of search of each domain on January 20, 2014. Asos.com and zalando.de are showing incredible search visibility in several Clothing & Accessories categories in the UK and Germany, respectively. The percentages in the infographic are based on the top 100 most visible domains in each category and the visibility of these domains derives from the top 20-25 most searched and competitive generic keywords per category.
These two domains take the #1 position in the categories above and what’s even more amazing is the share of search of the next ranking domain. The graph below shows the search market situation for Boots in Germany and the difference between zalando.de and the #2 domain (which varies over time) is almost constantly about 30 percent. Do you think Zalando is lonely up there?
So who are these guys and why are they so good at being seen? Maybe we can get some tips to increase our own visibility and rise above the tide? Let’s take a closer look.

ASOS Reinvents Themselves

ASOS, originally As Seen on Screen Ltd., is a UK-based online fashion and beauty retailer that was established in 2000. They sell branded and own-brand fashion items almost all over the world. In 2008, they received high acclaim for their online store from famous magazines like Cosmopolitan, In Style and Maxim. In 2010, ASOS received e-commerce Awards for both Best Direct Retailer and Best Use of Social Media. I could go on about their awards and recognition online and off, but I won’t. The fact is, in almost 14 years of service, they have become UK’s largest online fashion and beauty retailer and Google doesn’t mind at all.
What Google is really happy about, is the augmentation of search engine marketing that ASOS underwent last year to make their website even more retail savvy. SEM is important for any company that plans to convert traffic into revenue, regardless of whether they are actually selling products online or not. According to Marketing Week, ASOS increased their digital marketing efforts in 2013, focusing on country-specific campaigns. Gemma Lovelock, Director of promotions marketing agency Lock-In Marketing, also said that ASOS made sure that their online store was accessible to customers from anywhere and with any device. You can find details about the search marketing strategies of ASOS in recent a blog post by Lara Vogel that compares brands and retailers online. They’re not doing so bad on social media either which supports their organic visibility with social linking.
Large e-commerce sites may find it challenging to implement good SEO, but ASOS has managed brilliantly. According to Ruth Attwood, SEO Manager at 4Ps Marketing, large e-commerce websites should[c]ome up with a process for optimization, train [their] staff to do it properly, put quality procedures in place, measure the result of those changes, then rinse and repeat.” As someone who monitors share of search results on a daily basis, I can tell you that finding the right service to measure the results can be tricky, but it is definitely an important step. Apparently ASOS has done a great job and even managed the rinse and repeat with the unveiling of a new design for it’s men’s and women’s category pages, focusing strongly on product ideas and good content.

Zalando’s SEO Excellence

Zalando.de success all started in October 2008, with a small range of products from selected brands. Now, Zalando is live in 14 European countries and offers thousands of different brands. It won the 2012 German Marketing Prize for outstanding marketing performance and the 2012 European e-commerce award for best transnational online shop at the Global e-commerce Summit.
Zalando has excelled in many ways as far as marketing. They have poked around in social media, fancy TV ads, Google ads, and with the use of good content and linking, they have managed to optimize their page emphatically. I guess their idea was “go big or go home!” But it worked for them and it’s very likely that it would work for all kinds of industries. In 2011, Sebastian S. Vlasich of Business Development Strategies told us that Zalando uses social media to get potential customers to interact with them. He also talked about how they launched a new business concept, selling their own brand in a Pop-up store in Berlin, while offline, as an inaugural event for the brand. Although this doesn’t really have an effect on share of search, it definitely affects the brand’s recognition.

In an interview by State of Digital in June 2012, Alessio Madeyski, the SEO Manager of Zalando at the time, states that Zalando practices only white hat SEO as it is not a matter of the color of the hat, but what the user gains. “I strongly believe that the brand belongs to the user, not to the company. So we, as Zalando, are trying to do all we can to listen to what the user wants.” He prefers the term “idea building” instead of link building, as he believes in developing authentic relationships brought on by good content and creativity.
Now you know more about the monstrous waves in European search marketing and as you can see, there was no Greek God behind their amazing share of search. They simply followed the rules that we all know and aim to master. Of course, there was a bit of creativity in the mix and that should always be welcome. Gain inspiration from the success stories like these and use them as a guide for your own success, regardless of your industry or market. It might even be an opportunity for a little fish to grab a trident of their own!

Marin & DoubleClick Search Partner With Boost Media To Scale Ad Optimization

Marin & DoubleClick Search Partner With Boost Media To Scale Ad Optimization

Today, ad optimization solution Boost Media (formerly BoostCTR) announced new integration partnerships DoubleClick Search and Marin Software. Boost aims to help marketers scale the taxing process of creating, testing and reporting on search and social ad creative with a network of copywriters working in more than ten languages and algorithmically powers ad testing and optimization. Boost says clients see an average sales volume increase of 30 percent at a 5 percent lower CPA and save some 60 hours a month on ad creative development, testing and reporting.
Marketers using DoubleClick Search or Marin Software will be able to access the Boost solution within the platforms. Ad performance reporting will be streamlined and Boost users can request and approve ad creative directly from Marin and DoubeClick Search.
boost media integrates with marin software

Boost users will be able to access ad performance reporting within the Marin Platform
Matt Ackley, chief marketing officer at Marin Software, said, “Constantly writing and testing ads at scale across multiple campaigns can be a logistical nightmare for advertisers. By integrating with Boost Media, we’ve streamlined the process, improving customers’ ability to optimize ad copy and maximize profitability.”

Twitter & Vine To Hit The Big Screen This Summer

Twitter & Vine To Hit The Big Screen This Summer


Earlier this week, National CineMedia (NCM) announced a deal with Twitter to produce one-minute weekly shows highlighting trending movie and entertainment Tweets and Vine videos.
Scheduled to start the middle of this year, the shows will be screened in NCM theaters across the county.
NCM says moviegoers will be encouraged to take part in the social media conversations happening on its theater screens:

Through hashtags, fans will be able to share their thoughts on movies and may even see their own Tweets and Vines up on the silver screen alongside some of the biggest names in Hollywood.

According to NCM’s announcement, the series will be powered by Twitter Amplify, the social network’s video-promotion tool. Currently there are no sponsorships listed for the weekly shows, but NCM claims both it and Twitter are seeking brands to sponsor the series.
“We’re looking for an innovative brand that wants to become part of the movie experience in a valuable way by joining in, and even leading, the social media conversation,” said NCM’s president of sales and marketing Cliff Marks.

How Adobe Used Twitter To Generate Leads For An Online College Nobody Had Heard Of, Yet [Case Study]

How Adobe Used Twitter To Generate Leads For An Online College Nobody Had Heard Of, Yet [Case Study]


Anyone involved in marketing online higher education programs knows how competitive the space is. How is a new school with no name recognition supposed to compete with the plethora of institutions vying for attention at a reasonable cost per lead?
This was the challenge Adobe faced in marketing their client Mount Washington College. Though it’s owned by online education behemoth Kaplan, Inc., Mount Washington College (MWC) had changed its name and begun offering online degree programs in mid-2013. Adobe was tasked with increasing brand awareness and online engagement for the school while driving enrollment leads. Part of their advertising mix included Twitter.
I caught up with Paul Langtry, Account Director at Adobe to discuss the Twitter campaign he spearheaded for MWC (recently featured in a Twitter case study), how paid social compares to paid search and what it takes to run a successful Twitter campaign.
twitter lead generation cards case study
Langtry says the brand awareness challenge was a key reason they opted for a media plan that allocated half of the budget to social advertising. “In the case of Mount Washington College, non-brand paid search was going to be very competitive and expensive. Without that brand equity on non-brand keywords, we wanted to look at social. Social allows for great visuals and better brand positioning than a non-brand search campaign.”
The team started the Twitter campaign with standard promoted tweets and then added lead generation cards, which allow users to provide basic lead capture information — twitter handle, email and name — directly in the tweet without having to leave the platform.
Twitter lead generation cards expanded
When it came to audience targeting the key was to consistently drive scale. The team tested keyword, interest and username targeting. Langtry says they typically see the best performance come from username targeting then interest targeting. Keyword targeting often can be inconsistent depending on what users are tweeting about. The team began by combining interest (business, careers, job search, adult education) and username (to reach people similar to followers of accounts like @educationweek, @edutopia, @careerbuilder) targeting and then split them out to manage what was working best independently as they continued to tweak the targeting based on performance data.
In each case, ad copy was tailored to speak the particular audience targets and adjusted based on copy testing. They knew pricing information and affordability resonated with users and had success testing copy with the exact price of a specific course.
Langrtry said that when they added lead generation cards to the campaign, they considered the entire visual and made ad copy adjustments. The tweet becomes the setup, and the card has its own call-to-action with the graphic. “You don’t want to just take existing ad copy and pop in a card. You need to consider the entire ad experience.”
“With Twitter lead gen cards we could do branding plus lead generation. The performance can be very much in line with what you’d see on non-brand search,” said Langtry.
After adding the lead generation cards, Mount Washington College’s (MWC) conversion rate increased 101 percent at a 55 percent lower cost per lead. The brand’s follower rate also tripled.
Once a user submits their information, the lead data is transmitted to the client’s CRM system. There is a different follow up process for these leads than the traditional online form submissions, which typically include much more lead detail. Langtry says the email follow up is more informative for the Twitter leads because they tend to be much higher in the funnel — likely having not even been to the school’s website yet.
Which raises the question, do these leads actually convert into enrollments?  Langtry assured me MWC has been happy with the enrollment rates from Twitter leads. The campaign has been running for about seven months now and continues to scale with steady lead volume.
When asked about the differences he’s seen in managing paid search and paid social campaigns, Langtry says the major difference is that social campaigns often take more planning and experimentation to find what types of audiences and messages are going to work. Social usually doesn’t compete with the scale of paid search, but Langtry says they see success with social campaigns in most cases and recommend social to the majority of clients.
I asked Langtry what advice he would give to other Twitter advertisers. Here are his suggestions:
  1. Always separate mobile and desktop. Engagement rates and conversion rates will be different between the two and need to be managed accordingly.
  2. Use engagement rates as an early proxy, but they aren’t always a predictor for conversion rates. Wait until you get enough conversion data before making big decisions on segments, copy, etc.
  3. From a bidding perspective, be very hands on, particularly at launch. “If you wait too long to act, the tweet might already be decaying.” Twitter requires very active campaign management.
  4. Constantly test. Langrtry says they are always trying new creative and evolving targeting. They exclude poor performing targets, test new audiences and pull out top performing interest and usernames and give them their own budgets.

6 Tasks To Automate In AdWords Without Scripts Or Tools

6 Tasks To Automate In AdWords Without Scripts Or Tools


When we think about automation in PPC, our minds tend to jump to expensive tools like Marin, Kenshoo and Acquisio or advanced algorithms and Google Scripts.
However, you shouldn’t let the word “automation” scare you into forgetting the simple things that make it great: speed and consistency. Today, I’m going to take you through six common PPC tasks you can do yourself for free in AdWords through the magic and wonder of automation.

Search Query Reports

Working with multiple clients, there are certain tasks I want to do at least once a month — things that can be fairly time consuming and also will look amateurish if I forget to do them. Mining search queries is one of these tasks. You certainly don’t want your boss or client looking through your broad match terms and finding that your “Honda Cars” campaign has spent thousands on Honda lawnmower queries (I’ve seen it happen).
With this in mind, I decided to start automatically emailing myself the data I need, saving at least 15 minutes per week, per account and much more importantly, reminding me to actually pull the reports I’m supposed to.
Now, that Honda example I alluded to might be an extreme example, but consider the other end of the spectrum: a small account that hardly changes from month to month. After doing SQRs for a year, ignoring the need for them can become an easy thing to do — “I’m pretty sure there are no useless terms showing up, so I won’t check it this month” (or next month). What happens when new search trends or products start sneaking in and your own laziness has caused you to miss them? The answer is not “good things.”
To create a useful and automated search term report, you need to first open up your Search Terms data from the Keywords tab by selecting “Details” > “Search Terms” > “All.” From here, apply the filters relevant to your particular account. In my case, this first report is looking for all Keywords that have spent twice my cost per conversion target without converting.
setting up an sqr filter in AdWords
Once you apply this filter (or any filter that applies to how you normally do your search query mining), click on the download button to schedule this report. I do this on the first of the month for my small biz clients and weekly on specific days for larger accounts that need checking in on more regularly.
SQR Weekly Email In AdWords
Rather than jump through these hoops every time, I just open Excel straight from my email, select the queries that look like they’ve wasted money or aren’t too relevant, and drop them back into the AdWords Editor as negatives.
An SQR report in Excel
I call this my “money wasting terms” report. Another SQR report I email myself is “CTR killers” — a list of irrelevant search terms sorted by high impressions and a low number of clicks, e.g. clicks 1000.
Work out what you “need” to see every week/month and set up the report. I also recommend setting up a report for “terms to add,” which might look something like: Conversions > 2, Added/Excluded matches “None.”

Automated Bid Changes

There are plenty of ways to automate bid changes that don’t involve paying any money to anybody (other than our good friends at AdWords). You could just use the Google Conversion Optimizer, and I’ve seen good success from it on larger campaigns.
However, for smaller campaigns or accounts without conversion tracking, automated bid rules can save you a ton of time as long as you make sure to check in on them.
A dropdown showing change max cpc
I have one client whose ads perform way better in position three than any other position — it seems to be the sweet spot of conversion rate and cost.
For them, we have a relatively simple automated bid strategy set up, which utilizes two rules running concurrently. The first increases bids every day on keywords that have an average position less than 3.2 (with a max bid set to avoid things getting out of hand). The second rule runs exactly the same way but bids keywords down 5% that are higher than position 2.5.
A set of rules for changing max cpc
There are lots of options out there for automated bid adjustments. For accounts without conversion tracking, you could try bidding down all keywords with bounce rates way above your average.
Rules for decreasing bids
You can overlap a lot of these different bid rules to build a system that is much more robust and complex than could be done manually, and without wasting a lot of time. Make sure any overlapping rules make sense and aren’t causing anything crazy to happen (use min and max bids if worried).

Changing Ad Status

For offer-based ads, try using “Enable ads when…” and “Pause ads when…” from the “Automate” button within your ads tab.
I have a client who shows different messaging based upon the day of the week. During the week (Mon-Thurs), they run weekday package specials and for Fri-Sun they have ads showing their weekend pricing. I can automate to pause my weekday ads and unpause my weekend ads on Thursday night and vice versa on Sunday night.
The same thing can be equally useful for one-time events like pausing holiday specific ads. Nothing looks worse than ads where the content has expired — “Great Xmas Deals” tends to lose impact in February.
An ad automation rule pausing ads with xmas in

Dimensions Reports

Ever been in a meeting with your boss/client and have them ask something like, “Which countries are we selling well in?” or “How’s our traffic from tablets doing?”
These are the kinds of questions that, when answered quickly, show that you’re on the ball with your account — allowing you to send out exactly the kind of positive “this guy knows what he’s doing” vibes you want to be oozing with. They’re also the kind of questions for which I all too often have to stumble and say, “Err, I’ll get back to you on that.”
There are loads of these different insights you probably want to schedule for yourself:
  • Geo performance
  • Top landing pages
  • Device performance
  • Time of day
  • Day of the week
  • Call data
  • Etc.
I schedule these reports at the start of the month for each client. That way, I can quickly go through each report and mentally check off the major areas I need to be monitoring for each account.
A top cities report downloaded from the dimensions tab
The automation here is all done from within the download box in your dimensions tab. Essentially, all you have to do is set up your data in a way consistent with how you regularly want to see it — for example, the past 30 days for Geo data, filtering out non US traffic and sorting by conversions. Once you’ve done that, just open up “Email and schedule report” and send on the first of the month.

Account Alerts

An easy piece of AdWords automation you should set up is email alerts.
Account email alert options
I typically have at least 3 daily alerts set up for my accounts: one for Conversions coming in below my daily “low goal” (see example below), one for cost-per-conversion spikes, and one for costs being way over my daily average.
I set my alerts to email me at 7:00AM if the data from the previous day matches any of these conditions. This means that first thing when I check my email, I know if I have any fires to be fighting. Of course, your fancy software platform might do this for you, but there’s no reason you couldn’t be doing it easily and cheaply yourself.
An alert for a day with a low number of conversions

Pausing Campaigns

“I want my [insert holiday] campaigns to go live at [insert unsociable hour in the morning]” is a phrase that doesn’t have to depress the account manager who is in tune with their automation inner peace.
I regularly use the “Enable campaigns when…” and “Pause campaigns when…” options in AdWords to do exactly that for me.
Dropdown showing the options for pausing AdWords campaigns
The most recent example I can think of was for a client whose site was going to be down on a Sunday between 2:00AM and 4:00AM for essential maintenance. I simply set up two rules: one pausing all live campaigns and another re-enabling them.
Another good example is from a client whose sales team could only handle a set number of leads per day — once campaigns hit a certain number of conversions, the automated rules which ran every hour paused for the day.
The goal with all of these automation tips is always the same — making things easier on you and eliminating errors and mistakes. If there are any others that you regularly use in your accounts, let us know in the comments below!

You Can Love Your Marketing Data, Just Don’t Fall Under Its Spell

You Can Love Your Marketing Data, Just Don’t Fall Under Its Spell

I have a conflicted relationship with data.

On the plus side, I believe that data is one of the three biggest benefits that the digitization of the world has given us marketers. (The other two are malleability, the ability to easily change, experiment with and personalize the digital canvas, and intimacy, more direct interactions with customers.)
I believe that good, data-driven decision-making can compensate for many of our irrational mental biases and lead us to better outcomes.
And, I believe that every modern marketer should become adept at using data properly. If you’re not harnessing data to make your marketing programs better, you’re missing the 21st century.

Data Fundamentals Vs. Data Fundamentalism

However, I don’t believe that data has all the answers. In particular, I get itchy when I hear people imply that data will generate their strategy or creative.
Analyzing the linguistic data of Harry Potter and The Cuckoo’s Calling to discover, with high probability, that Robert Galbraith was actually a pseudonym of J.K. Rowling is a great example of what data and machine learning can do. Actually writing Harry Potter or The Cuckoo’s Calling is a good example of what they cannot do.
I believe that data can provide the inspiration for new ideas in strategy and creative, especially when we take an exploratory approach to all the data we have available to us. And, I believe that data, especially in the context of a controlled experiment, can provide validation for those new ideas.
But, I do not believe that strategy and creative will predictably emerge from the data of their own accord. On the supposed end of theory that big data will bring us, I call, um, malarkey.
Kate Crawford wrote a blog post on the Harvard Business Review site last year, The Hidden Biases in Big Data, where she labeled this unrealistic faith in data to have all the answers as “data fundamentalism.”
I believe in data fundamentals — using data in the right way, in the right context. But I eschew data fundamentalism. Knowing what data cannot do is equally as important as knowing what it can.

The Map & The Territory

I also get itchy when people claim that data is truth. How many times have you been in a meeting where someone brandishes a statistic to “prove” their point of view — without weighing the caveats and context in which that statistic was calculated? Things like selection bias,sample size, confidence intervals, and confounding variables matter.
Statistics show that people love content marketing. But do the characteristics of the content matter? Do the characteristics of the audience matter? (Hint: yes and yes.)
An often repeated phrase, attributed to Polish-American scientist and philosopher Alfred Korzybski, comes immediately to mind: “The map is not the territory.”
Just because someone drew a map of a mountain, doesn’t mean that is how the mountain actually is in reality. The map is obviously a simplification — otherwise the map would be as big as the mountain itself. So, there inherently must be many things missing from it. Things may have changed since the map was drawn, say, due to an avalanche or an earthquake. Or the cartographer may simply have made errors — in observation, in translation, in judgment or in drawing the map itself.
The practical wisdom of Korzybski’s insight: if you come to a cliff, don’t keep walking just because the map says there’s a bridge there.
I’m not saying that maps aren’t helpful. They’re incredibly helpful. But when you’re driving to dinner, I would recommend not keeping your eyes glued solely to your GPS. Checking out your windshield for oncoming traffic is probably a smart idea, too. (An analogy that I must credit toGord Hotchkiss.)
This is the same healthy skepticism that marketers should bring to their use of data. Data isn’t always true, and even when it is, it’s almost never the whole truth.

Let’s Not Be Rash

I know, this may not be a popular point of view in an “Analytics” column. And I should probably talk to my doctor about all these itching sensations.
So let me reiterate: data is a wonderful thing. The intelligent use of analytics is an incredible skill for a marketer to wield — and an immensely powerful asset for an organization to have within its ranks.
But recognizing the limitations of data — and the cognitive biases that arise as much from usingdata as they do from not using it — will make you a better analyst, a better marketer and more fun at parties.
You can love your data. Just don’t fall under its spell.